The Lighthouse Writers Top-Secret Blog

All the latest news, ideas, and opinions from Denver's Independent Literary Center: lighthousewriters.org

Sent from Seattle: Digital Lit at AWP 2014

by Laurie Sleeper

Friday morning, I decided to attend Digital Lit: Why Online Magazines Deserve More Respect. Since I haven’t had much respect for online magazines up to now, I wondered whether the panel could change my mind. Consider me a convert!

The Digital Lit world was well represented by the panel members, all either the editor or editor-in-chief of their respective publications: Martha Nichols, of Talking Writing (talkingwriting.com); Lee Hope of Solstice (solsticelitmag.org); J. W. Wang of Juked (juked.com); and Matthew Limpede of Carve (carvezine.com). Talking Writing is the youngest of these magazines, founded in 2010. Even so, at four years old, TW has outlived most online and print journals, which typically fail within the first three years. Solstice was formed a couple of years earlier, while Carve has been online since 2000 and Juked since 1999. Ancient history in Internet years!

Martha opened by admitting that since the time she submitted the panel proposal for AWP 2014, she had already seen a shift in the respect given towards online magazines in just one year (but still not as much as they deserve). The world of Digital Lit is changing every second, and in another five years, a panel like this might not even exist. Given the amount of work these people do for their publications and the seriousness with which they take their work, I believe she’s right. As J. W. pointed out, the distinction between print and online is disintegrating. Even the Best American series and the O. Henry awards have allowed submissions from online journals for the last couple of years.

logo solsticeLee discussed how Solstice does not try to imitate a print journal, and that they want to exist outside of print. For example, Solstice has a performance poetry editor as part of their staff, something that would be impossible for a print magazine. But she also emphasized that although Solstice likes to push against the boundaries of print media, every piece they publish still has gone through a juried review by at least three readers and editors. At this point, Solstice only publishes 5% of all the submissions they receive, further proof of a careful selection process.

CarveycakesMatthew continued by emphasizing that online journals can offer benefits that print journals cannot. For example, Carve allows comments on the stories they publish online, which develops a community of readers and writers. Some stories receive comments and discussions years after they are originally published, something that print publications simply can’t provide. He also suggested that part of the increased respect for online journals resulted from the recession, which caused some print journals to go online due to budget cuts.

The major advantage for writers publishing with online magazines is the potential for a much larger audience than a traditional print journal. Talking Writing gets 250,000 page views a year. When Solstice publishes their triquarterly journal, they get 12,000-14,000 hits in the first few days. While Best American or O. Henry may not be awarding prizes to the work published in these online journals quite yet, is this the only measurement of writing quality? Solstice was won Best of the Net, as well as the Million Writers Award. Who gets to decide what recognition is the best?

For me, I’m going to give online magazines serious consideration. As a writer, I have to decide whether getting into a print journal with less than 1,000 subscribers is “better” for my writing career than getting into an online journal which, if not quite as “respected,” could potentially provide me with thousands of readers. Do I want to send my work off to a print publication, never to hear from it again, or would I rather discuss my story online with an interested and engaged community? Digital Lit will never replace print journals, and no one on the panel wants this—we all love our books! But what an exciting time for writers and their publishers, as we embrace the Digital Age and explore new ways of delivering and receiving literary content. Online literary journals are here to stay, and it’s time for us to welcome them.

3 comments on “Sent from Seattle: Digital Lit at AWP 2014

  1. andreadupree
    March 1, 2014

    This is something I’ve changed my tune about as well. I had some early bad experiences with online journals, but the past several that I’ve worked with have been astonishing. I’m especially fond of places like Freight that actually edit the way a great print journal edits. Thanks for reporting from the field, Laurie! By not going to AWP this year, I’m hearing a LOT more about the panels.

  2. Anonymous
    March 1, 2014

    Thanks for the great report, Laurie. Awesome stat about readership.

  3. Erika Krouse
    March 1, 2014

    Yay, Laurie! Thanks for sharing this panel with us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on March 1, 2014 by in Cool Events, Member dispatches, The Scoop, The Write Idea, Uncategorized, Writing.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 332 other followers

Follow us on Twitter!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 332 other followers

%d bloggers like this: